Mahyar: @NotGodOkay: Are you upset because I don't agree with you? Do you blame me for all those comments under that painting? If you remember, I said: I admire the design, the shading, the effort, everything! But not this content... because it was made to stimulate instinct... And then I said: This is not natural. This is something that if Kazrad knew it existed, he would use his server hard drive as a nutcracker... which was mostly a joke, but then you came and said: @Mahyar: No one cares but you. And that's where you started the discussion... I mean, if you hadn't started it, all that discussion wouldn't have happened!
Mahyar: And what kind of freedom is this when it’s one‑dimensional?
Why is it so one‑sided?
Why does disagreement automatically turn into “silence them”?
Mahyar: @NotGodOkay: Why? Why does disagreement automatically make someone your enemy?
Think about it for a second.
When your first reaction is “ban him,” that’s how authoritarian thinking starts.
Mahyar: @NotGodOkay: What are you all even mad about?
You got what you wanted, your art, your booru, and your little mob victory.
Enjoy it. I’m done caring. It’s clear this isn’t a space for discussion but childish stubbornness.
Mahyar: I see a new piece has arrived-titled “Haters gonna hate.”
Okay. Thank you for making it clear that you operate like dictators.
Instead of engaging, you silence opposition and double down on stubbornness.
Fine. Create whatever you want. This is you, this is your pen, this is your booru with 2009 graphics.
Create and enjoy.
Mahyar: @damrok4321: @asdf123 may be new here, but he’s clearly paying attention.
Understanding doesn’t come from account age, it comes from actually listening.
Mahyar: And the difference between me and them is this: they are many, I am alone. They attack, I defend. They promote base reproductive instincts, I promote honor.
Mahyar: @asdf123: I just told them that this art style is bad for a comic character, because it's a comedic/bitter story, it has adult language but it never directly shows the explicit content. And you know what they did? They attacked! Like a locust! They didn't even listen to what I was saying! I'm talking about respecting the character, but they called me "religious" they told me "you get information from Google" they told me "you're not an artist, you just know how to cut a picture from a comic and put it in a picture" But I never made fun of their art, even if you scroll down you can see I admired this art and said: I admire the design, the shading, the effort, everything! But not this content... because it was made to stimulate instinct... Meaning we are human, we shouldn't rely on old instincts like our cavemen ancestors, we should be honorable... But alas... I'm a clown! Why? Because if I weren't a clown, I wouldn't be here to have a philosophical discussion... Now compare for yourself, who is more ruthless...
Mahyar: @GrizzlyBear: Yes, I read the comic. And I saw that poor Katia was constantly getting drunk, losing her clothes and then someone ra.ped her... Yes, I read it. But! Whenever Katia got naked, firstly it was an accident, not intentional, secondly there was always a censorship frame on her body (not like this picture where Katia's ass is in the frame) and of course the atmosphere of the comic was comedy! There was never a direct sexual atmosphere, even if Katia got naked or used adult language. Katia Managan's comic is in the 18+ category, but the atmosphere is not considered sexual. It's mostly comedy, like Family Guy! Sometimes it has adult jokes but never shows sexual organs.
Mahyar: @NotGodOkay: I am not entirely against banning sexual “fan‑art” for other characters (e.g. rajirra); that decision is entirely up to the individual. My problem is limited to the fact that a specific character—katia, who is defined as a source of humor and story—is turned into a sexual object. If the same kind of sexualization‑entertainment were applied to an antagonist (e.g. rajirra), I would have no problem with it, because the antagonist’s role in the narrative is usually negative and anti‑heroic, and his transformation into a sexual object does not interfere with the main purpose of the story (which is to focus on humor and the main character). This position separates my stance from any religious considerations or restrictions; it is based purely on cognitive principles and on preserving narrative coherence.
Mahyar: Alright, let's look at this from a neurobiological perspective.
When people see a character, the first systems that react are the fast sensory reward circuits.
Low level pattern detectors send the image straight to the limbic system, where the amygdala and nucleus accumbens generate quick reward predictions.
Anything that triggers a rapid dopamine response gets prioritized automatically.
Narrative intent, character depth, and the creator’s boundaries are processed much later in the prefrontal cortex, the slow and energy heavy part of the brain.
So many individuals default to whatever interpretation produces the fastest reward with the least cognitive effort.
Mahyar: I'm not saying "this content bothers me."
I'm asking why such content should exist in the first place.
My objection is about respecting the character.
Why should a humorous, narrative-driven character be reduced to a sexualized toy?
This isn't about sensitivity or personal discomfort.
It's about preserving the artistic integrity of a character whose creator intentionally avoided explicit content.
Mahyar: @Radiocaster: And why am I so greedy like a vegetable steamer? Because I don't like to see Katia become a consumer toy... Yes! I like to keep it in the artistic/comic framework (even in the story, Kazerad never directly showed nudity or the scenes where the Orc ra.p.ed her, even when he wanted to show his nudity he at least threw in a censored frame!
Mahyar: @radiocaster: Katia is miserable... She didn't get lucky in her story, nor from fans, nor from paintings... It's like the whole world hates her... What's the problem with people with her? Whenever we search "Katia Managan" on Google, 90% of the photos are Katia's ass and pussy (I apologize for my language... of course, what's the point)
Mahyar: Well, look... it's useless. It was once for mating, but now? We're licking an LCD! Why? Because instinct dictates, but where do we discharge it? On a miserable virtual cat who was drunk and ra*ped all her life (yes, you're right, kazerad himself hated Katya)
Mahyar: We talked about it before, that all this is just to stimulate the mating instinct... The important thing is that humans are in the primate group, humans are an advanced type of animal, so they have the same old animal instinct.
Dramatic Descriptions
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
Why is it so one‑sided?
Why does disagreement automatically turn into “silence them”?
- Reply
Think about it for a second.
When your first reaction is “ban him,” that’s how authoritarian thinking starts.
- Reply
- Reply
You got what you wanted, your art, your booru, and your little mob victory.
Enjoy it. I’m done caring. It’s clear this isn’t a space for discussion but childish stubbornness.
- Reply
- Reply
Okay. Thank you for making it clear that you operate like dictators.
Instead of engaging, you silence opposition and double down on stubbornness.
Fine. Create whatever you want. This is you, this is your pen, this is your booru with 2009 graphics.
Create and enjoy.
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
Understanding doesn’t come from account age, it comes from actually listening.
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
When people see a character, the first systems that react are the fast sensory reward circuits.
Low level pattern detectors send the image straight to the limbic system, where the amygdala and nucleus accumbens generate quick reward predictions.
Anything that triggers a rapid dopamine response gets prioritized automatically.
Narrative intent, character depth, and the creator’s boundaries are processed much later in the prefrontal cortex, the slow and energy heavy part of the brain.
So many individuals default to whatever interpretation produces the fastest reward with the least cognitive effort.
- Reply
I'm asking why such content should exist in the first place.
My objection is about respecting the character.
Why should a humorous, narrative-driven character be reduced to a sexualized toy?
This isn't about sensitivity or personal discomfort.
It's about preserving the artistic integrity of a character whose creator intentionally avoided explicit content.
That's the point.
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply