ADudeCalledLeo: no uwus allowed

GrizzlyBear: @ADudeCalledLeo: Yeah who do you think we are, a bunch of damned furries?

Zargothrax: Criminal scum

Zeroranic: Tbh i think most of us are furrys. Or at least think anthro animals are cool and look ,,cute''

Caps: Don't UwU me.

xxx_orkslayergamer6969_xxx: looking cute does not save you from being gameend'd

KuroNeko: This is why Katia keeps making bad decision. All her head is eyes and there's no place for her brain.

Zargothrax: She's transforming into Eyetia.

KuroNeko: @Zargothrax: There's a cruel lack of Eyetia on the booru.
People don't do weird art anymore

KuroNeko: This is a sin against art and I regret everything.

DarthVader: Why? Just Why?
Sit in the corner and think about what you’ve done.

Tabby_Catface: Blessed masterpiece.

APayne1776_2: This is probably the best and worst thing I have seen

Rick2tails: more worst then anything XD

Caps: Kattia has been eatting to much cake lately. ; P

ADudeCalledLeo: THANKS I HATE IT

Tejo: Oh no, you wronged Katia and the pig!

AMKitsune: @KuroNeko: How about this many?

KuroNeko: Barely enough but it'll do... for now.
also
Pretty nice animation :) attack of the clones but the clones are sad. And a yellow weird cat thing.

semiafro007: @AMKitsune: I love you man

semiafro007: @APayne1776_2: we created this army

DarthVader: Order 66

DarthVader: Execute Order 66!

Caps: @xxx_orkslayergamer6969_xxx: Yes. : D

Caps: @AMKitsune: Now we have to many Kattias. The universe will be not be able to handle so many Kattias.

Rick2tails: with so many Katias no one will mind if I take one home *procures one cat*

Caps: @Rick2tails: And then that one Kattia started to reproduce by mistosis into a infinite number of Kattias.

Caps: She is an adorable little fella.

ADudeCalledLeo: faerie of (un)luckiness

Whistle: IT is beautifully painted

lapma: Nice work. But why does she have actual underwear?

APayne1776_2: The fairy godmother I wish I had

Zargothrax: @KuroNeko: I can give you a better anthro problem: try designing a headphone. Earpods are out, we're talking studio grade over ear headphones. If you were to design it naively and simply have it envelope the ears with a band on the top, it'll be top-heavy with no clamping force. A small tilt on the head and it falls off.
@AMKitsune: Aww, she's even prettier in color. And nice job changing the color of the wings to be closer to mysticisms representation in the comic.
@TempIntel: Well, she's allergic to that, on the other hand... @ADudeCalledLeo: she can spread misfortune instead of pixie dust. And light everything aflame.
@Whistle: Thank you.
@lapma: For YOU dear moderators. And for me for being lazy to draw clothes but didn't want to tag my drawing 'questionable' for nudity. _{(and I don't really like the aesthetics of the painted underwear. It's good for memes though)}

KuroNeko: @Zargothrax: Make them so that it softly pinch the ears, that way they won't fall.
Or even better, take the superior option and draw a lizard instead of a cat. No more ear problems :p

Caps: Now Kattia should be able to defeat dragons since she is a fairy type.

lapma: @Caps: noice one

Sashimi: I find this to be quite appealing!

Rick2tails: painted underwear was good for a specific time in katias life but as a long term thing its beyond dumb

lapma: A little thing i did in work today.

KuroNeko: OTP!
https://www.prequeladventure.com/fanartbooru/post/view/5941#search=user_id%3D1798

Rick2tails: no wonder I never saw this since its 4 + years old. nice work here

Sashimi: What? this was uploaded back in '13 and it's only now receiving comments? Cool pic though!

WassapDude94:

Sashimi said:
What? this was uploaded back in '13 and it's only now recieving comments? Cool pic though

hey if it wasn't because i was bored and looked trough Skyrim slutcats this wouldn't have happened

WassapDude94: also i just found out this way of mentioning aka quoting and its far better to me ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Sashimi: @WassapDude94: It's good that you were looking around then! Wonder how many other pics have slipped through the cracks with nary a comment?

WassapDude94: DID I JUST NOW NOTICE THE PINEAPPLE

Asperger_kitten_1337: @WassapDude94: yes

xxx_orkslayergamer6969_xxx: Is it just me or why does it look like she has a hoove for a foot?

Caps: The best Kattia version.
She can speak the dragon's tongue.

Caps: https://youtu.be/UsnRQJxanVM

DarthVader: Welcome to the Galactic Empire!

TrashPanda545: Thank you Lord Vader

Doprolol: там там трарарарарам
там там трарарарарам
там там трарарарарам
там там трарарарарам
ТА--ТА--ТАМ!-ТА-ТАТАМ!-ТА-ТАТАМ!!!
ТА--ТА--ТАМ!-ТА-ТАТАМ!-ТА-ТАТАМ!!!
ТА--там-ТАТА--там-тарарарам-ТАТАМ-тарарарам-ТА--ТАТАМ--ТАТАТАМ
ТА--там-ТАТА--там-тарарарам-ТАТАМ-тарарарам-ТА--ТАТАМ--ТАТАТАМ
пурурур пурурур та--та-татам тарарам
пурурур пурурур та--та-татам тарарам
пурурур пурурур та--та-татам тарарам
пурурур пурурур та--та-татам тарарам
Та-тарарара-Та-тарарара
ТА--ТА--ТАМ!-ТА-ТАТАМ!-ТА-ТАТАМ!!!
ТА--ТА--ТАМ!-ТА-ТАТАМ!-ТА-ТАТАМ!!!
ТА--ТА--ТАМ!-ТА-ТАТАМ!-ТА-ТАТАМ!!!
ТА--ТА--ТАМ!-ТА-ТАТАМ!-ТА-ТАТАМ!!!
ТА--там-ТАТА--там-тарарарам-ТАТАМ-тарарарам-ТА--ТАТАМ--ТАТАТАМ
ТУ--ТУ-ТУТУ-ТУ-ТУТУ-ТУ-ТУТУ!!!
ТА-ТАРАРАРАРА-ТАРАРАРА-ТРРРРРРРРР!!!
БУМ!

TrashPanda545: @Doprolol: Очень приятно и спасибо, Допролол. Я немного говорят по русской

Doprolol: Кстати, очень красиво!

RoninSmall: @Doprolol: хватит петь, бард. Ты пьян

Doprolol:

Rick2tails: a little short to be a stormtrooper arent you?

Toryu-Mau: ... They really did not design these helmets for people with long snouts, eh? >):^X

xxx_orkslayergamer6969_xxx: I feel like something bad is going to happen since she is a stormtrooper and you know what happens to stormtroopers when they're the enemies in a video game.

AMKitsune: Wow, this is one political comment section. Might as well throw my hat into the ring to.

I'm not an expert in political regimes or ideologies but take a pretty simplistic view of these things instead.

Up to and including this point in history, there's no such thing as a perfect 'ism'. Certainly not as they're currently enacted at least.

For a start, healthy and happy societies tend to rely on the assumptions that everyone will act fairly and kindly towards each other. Unfortunately, this often isn't the case. If the multimillionaire business executive were to pay their factory floor staff a decent wage instead of choosing to amass a disproportionate amount of wealth for themselves (hence the whole 1% vs the 99% thing), there wouldn't be the massive difference in wealth that there is in the western world today. Of course people should be able to determine how much they're able to make by how much they work for it, but when the ability of a person to earn a wage is determined by another individual who also wants a larger slice of the pie, that's where personal greed can fuck the whole capitalism system up.

I believe that the same goes for the idea behind communism as well. If my understanding is correct, the general idea is that everyone receives pretty much what they need from the system and not much more while putting into the system what they can. An attempt to create a level playing field if you will. Again though, this relies on the groups in charge of maintaining the system to be honest and fair with how wealth and resources are distributed. To my knowledge, this rarely happens. Citizens live in relative poverty while the leaders of a nation who's job it is to ensure the prosperity of its people live in palaces.

This isn't limited to communism though by any means. How many other countries and organisations are there where the ones supposedly responsible for making the rules and distributing wealth end up becoming disproportionately wealthy?

secondly, life isn't fair. Any attempt by a government to make life fair is going to inevitably require unequal treatment/requirements of its citizens. Say, a person is born without arms. They can't provide for themselves as well as others will be able to through no fault of their own. Those are just the cards they were dealt. So what? Is it just accepted that they're going to have a harder life than everyone else and leave it at that, or is some of the wealth generated by other productive members of society siphoned off to help this less capable individual? Not everyone shares the same mindset with regards to whether this is good or not, so there's another problem. Is it fairer for it to be 'everyone for themselves' and to hell with those who can't keep up, or should the state step in to 'unfairly redistribute' wealth to those who haven't earned it as much as you have? Of course there are no solid answers for these questions. That's what makes matters like this so difficult to legislate for. So many different people have different opinions, yet you can't have a country that has different rules for different people (not a fair one at least).

There have been many varied atrocities caused by different governments of all different ideologies over time. In the argument of capitalism vs communism, one ideology will have produced more poverty and/or bloodshed than the other, but that's for a historian to say, not myself.

While arguing about which is better/worse though, just remember that the decisions that usually end up causing detriment to others (regardless of the political system) are often made by people who, strangely enough, find themselves reasonable well off and comfortable. Significantly more-so than the people they're charged with looking after.

Anyway, that's my uneducated ramble/contribution to the discussion.

lapma: @AMKitsune: I like what you wrote, but i think there are some things i would argue."Of course people should be able to determine how much they're able to make by how much they work for it, but when the ability of a person to earn a wage is determined by another individual who also wants a larger slice of the pie" Thats true, but its easier to negociate wage with boss than with government in case of communism(common ownership of the means of production). And 2cnd employee can always try to find other job if he/she is not happy with wage. While in communism worker prety much need to be a part of some kind of political organisation if he/she want to get good job/wage. Im from Poland so i can give some examples from my country. Meat and some of the other food products were only aviable to get with ration cards. Or for the example if somebody in your familly worked in the west and wanted to send some money back to Poland, government would take the money and in excange would give you a coupon that you could use in shop called Pewex (Przedsiębiorstwo Eksportu Wewnętrznego, in english
Internal Export Company and of course it was state enterprise) so you could not even have real western money. And by the way those coupons value was way lowwer than value of real money. And thats only a few examples of what communism is in practic. So taking into account fact that in communism country government is preety much in harge of what what you can or cant buy, I dont think that having a low wage as a worker with low qualifications(those are people earning realy low wages) is not such a big deal in comparisson to having much of your live decided for you by government. As usualy im sorry for any mistakes.

AMKitsune: @lapma: Well, this calls for a part 2.

While it may very well be easier to negotiate a wage and switch jobs in a capitalist nation, in many cases it's either impossible or very financially risky to try leaving an existing job and get another one (given the recent economic troubles and poor job market). People are technically free to do so if they wish, but being free to try negotiating a higher salary or switching to a better job can in some cases be akin to being free to step out of a speeding train. You're more than free to do so and nobody's stopping you. You just know that there's a dangerously high chance that you'll come out worse for taking the option. (Not the case for everybody, but with the job market as it currently is, that's how it is for many people. The fact that it's an individuals responsibility to find employment where there may not even be any in order to support themselves can make the prospect of a government having job opportunities for all of its citizens with a stable income seem rather appealing.)

The issue of preferential treatment if you're a member of a certain political party/peer group is a common problem all over. That's just a product of people in positions of power allowing their personal biases to effect how they treat others in official contexts (in short, corruption).

Speaking of limiting what can be purchased with earned wealth, there have been schemes like that in the west before as well.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Company_scrip
From what I remember being told about it (I'm too tired to read a wikipedia article right now XD), employers like mine operators would sometimes pay their workers in a 'custom currency' that could only be spent at shops also owned by the mine owner (effectively creating a miniature enclosed economy where the workers couldn't buy from anywhere else. Kind of like a form of communism where the employer could have ownership of everything from the homes of the workers to the provision of the food on their plates. Like a little self appointed government). This practice is illegal in most developed capitalist areas now thankfully, but it did used to happen.

When done right, the west has a pretty good analogue to the communist lifestyle in the form of the armed services (at least, that seemed to be the case back when my grandfather was in the air-force and my father lived with his parents in air-force accommodation.).
While they could interact with the rest of the economy like any other person could (buy stuff with real money), a great deal of their lives was managed and provided for by the military, including housing, schooling, e.t.c.
It's not a lifestyle that everyone would want, but for those who would, it was an option.
Of course, this is just based on what my father's told me about his childhood, so it's a personal rely of personal experiences and memories.

At the end of the day, my overly simplistic view of it comes down to people. Good, honest and well intentioned people can make a system fair and prosperous if they so choose and try hard enough. It only takes a few selfish, malicious or incompetent people in positions of power to make it hard (or impossible) for the common people to live well.

If I had to imagine, a communist state could work well for everyone if it were managed by such a hypothetical group of good people and if membership of the commune was voluntary. Alas though, as is so often the case, many people who seek power and status do so for their own reasons and not the selfless service of others (and for those who do have pure intentions, resisting the temptations that come with said power is another matter entirely).

Mr_O: I highly enjoy this image, thank you for your service.

lapma: @AMKitsune: About company scrip, sadly it used to happen, but it was an exception while in communism its close to being normal(especially that one of communism goals is abolishing of money). And about military as a analaogue to communism, military can work as it does, only because it is funded by taxpayers. Military produces little on its own so it has to be based on taxpayer money. Whole country can't work as a military because it would not be able to produce enought to sustain all of its citizens. I dont want to argue about ideals of communism(i still think that they are wrong, but i can see why someone would like it) but I simply think that communism is bad economic system, it is inposible to create working market while you only have state enterprise and government is deciding prices on any goods. And worst of all is abolishing of money. People have a diversed intrestings and while someone might want to spend his money on a car somebody else might be intrested in table top miniatures. How can a government ration all of those diffrent goods to peope with diffrent needs. Communism kills individuality and in place of individuality creates group mentality. But i came out of track, so going back to military, it can work with all of those government provided stuff because of the taxpayer money. And there would be no taxpayer money without strong market. And last but not least military is armed service after all, so its hard to expect it working like some kind of private company. Well i think i should draw something now, instead of talking about communism.

AMKitsune: @lapma: Part the third

I get that company scrip happened much less than the the communism equivalent My point there was simply that given the opportunity, individuals in capitalist nations have been known to enact psudo-communist practices for their own selfish benefit.

That's a very good point about the lifestyle provided by the military not being financially self sustaining. Honestly, the way things are progressing these days with regards to mass production and automation, the idea that there's a job for everyone is becoming less and less true. In the west at least, we seem to be entering an era where we don't work to produce things that we need, but to produce things that other people will hopefully want and buy. Jobs like food production can be handled by far fewer people now than used to be the case, so people have to try to find whatever source of income they can elsewhere (assuming that there are people willing and able to hire them).

As far as I'm concerned, there is no best system. Disregarding the fact that greedy people can turn any system into a nightmare, both systems have their up-sides and down-sides. Capitalism is great for those who can 'win' at it, but sucks for the 'losers' while communism is fine as long as you're ok just 'making do' and don't aspire for greater things in life.

Yeah, this has dragged on more that long enough. Time for more cats

Raydio: penis

GrizzlyBear: Goddamn. I never knew threads here got this heated

lapma: @GrizzlyBear: That's kinda what you should expect posting any ideological symbol, especially if it represents extreme views like communism/national socialism/etc.

xxx_orkslayergamer6969_xxx: COMMIEEE! COMMIE!