DAEDRIC FUN TIP:
A higher power gifts you comment boxes, do not sully them with unnecessary linked images

2142: adorable artist:8Aerondight8 braids character:Katia_Managan character:Little_Katia guar_plush happy kittens

adorable artist:8Aerondight8 braids character:Katia_Managan character:Little_Katia guar_plush happy kittens

- Reply
Geravind: Yay, a squirrel!

- Reply
Armored-Struggle-Wagon: This is Immensely frightening. Kill it with the nukes!

- Reply
CaptainLackwit: OH MY GOD THE MISSING TOOTH

THAT IS SO CUTE

- Reply
Kewot_Rokar: GAH! DYING FROM CUTENESS

2146: adorable artist:KillerfishSG character:Katia_Managan ear-tilt hoodie_katia portrait

adorable artist:KillerfishSG character:Katia_Managan ear-tilt hoodie_katia portrait

- Reply
Geravind: Yay, a fox!

- Reply
Armored-Struggle-Wagon: 0/10 No dismemberment, decapitations, or any other sort of bodily harm. (jk This Is super adorable :3 10/10)

2137: armor artist:YeOldeAlekk character:your_weird_OC eyepatch machete questionable shield

- Reply
jegjurel: dem pauldrons doe

- Reply
Man_Of_Mer: @jegjurel: They don't look practical. Doe.

- Reply
Armored-Struggle-Wagon: They look like they would make her just fall over And won't be able to get back up.
@jegjurel:

- Reply
Vidiotdragon: The makeup is a nice touch

2128: Kvatch_arena_armor artist:Freeze-pop88 character:Katia_Managan monochrome portrait

Kvatch_arena_armor artist:Freeze-pop88 character:Katia_Managan monochrome portrait

- Reply
Kewot_Rokar: Holy zombie jesus! This is good! Why can't my hands do this! DAMN SHAKY HANDS!!!

- Reply
Armored-Struggle-Wagon: Show us your dark ways of pencil-magic!

- Reply
8Aerondight8: Ayy lmao

- Reply
GlowSparkletBox: 11/10

- Reply
ThatGuyWithAKhajiitWaifu: This is fucking great C:. 10 pineapples out of 10

2140: Cloak_of_Gray_Tomorrow artist:Deecio blind_eyes character:Katia_Managan chiaroscuro

Cloak_of_Gray_Tomorrow artist:Deecio blind_eyes character:Katia_Managan chiaroscuro

- Reply
Deecio: I'd love to get some criticism from anybody if they've got some, I'm always looking to improve! (also sorry about the image size)

- Reply
AMKitsune: What's wrong with the image size? It's a good high resolution without being 'stupid high' resolution. The best of both worlds.

As far as critique goes, the only things that I can see that could use a little work are the shapes of her head and neck. As they are, her neck's a bit on the wide side and her head seems oddly shaped and positioned relative to her neck (her head strangely melds into her torso). Kazerad has a good example of a profile shot of Katia's head on this 'drawing guide'

http://www.prequeladventure.com/fanartbooru/post/view/999

Besides that though, everything else's brilliant. The pose and clothing are spot on, the lighting's soft but believable and the 'blinding effect' matches the comic while having it's own eerie 'realism' about it.

I hope that was of some help.

- Reply
CaptainLackwit: I do love how you've depicted the blinding effect.

That whole stealing-the-iris thing was a stroke of artistic genius.

- Reply
Deecio: Thanks a ton for the critique and compliments, I really appreciate it! Also thanks for the link to the drawing reference, I never knew about it :D

- Reply
KingClaws: Aside from the absent jawline/chin, and ears which reach down her neck, this is a solid drawing. 7/10

I love the blindness effect. I hope Kazerad uses something like it.

- Reply
8Aerondight8: This is why you should wait for the paint to dry before going back to fill in any details, also long floppy sleeves can really make a mess on you canvas.

- Reply
CaptainLackwit: @KingClaws: He does tho.

2138: character:Katia_Managan portrait sketch smiling tears text

character:Katia_Managan portrait sketch smiling tears text

- Reply
Armored-Struggle-Wagon: We've already achieved this goal, around 8 times now. Let's do something reversed, Goal: Happytimes!

- Reply
tronn: This is a solid plan and I wholeheartedly support it!

- Reply
Man_Of_Mer: I thought she was screaming like a football announcer.

2118: artist:Mediocre_Scrublord character:Katia_Managan

artist:Mediocre_Scrublord character:Katia_Managan

- Reply
Kewot_Rokar: Whatcha, Uh, staring at?

- Reply
tronn: I like it, she's alarmed yet intrigued!
- Reply
MetalC0Mmander: Looks like a mask to me.

- Reply
Makkon: This is a really adorable style!
- Reply
MetalC0Mmander: Wait a while and see if you still find scrublord's style adorable.

- Reply
Mediocre_Scrublord: ???

- Reply
Mediocre_Scrublord: Are you talking shit?

- Reply
Bob: @Mediocre_Scrublord:
Shit got real D:

2116: character:Katia_Managan controversial merchandise monochrome paintbrush painted_underwear questionable very_casually_underdressed

showing 10 of 20 comments

- Reply
Armored-Struggle-Wagon: @tronn: Goddammit tronn :l

- Reply
AMKitsune: @Armored-Struggle-Wagon: I think I have to agree on this one. While it's an excellent picture and by no means sexually explicit, the 'ass-centric' nature of the image coupled with the fact that she's naked here pushes this image just over the threshold of what I'd consider suitable for this booru. However, going back and re-reading the upload rules, this image does seem to fall under that questionable category as it's contains neither explicit nudity or sex. One aspect of the image that throws its position on this booru into question is the part of the upload TOS that says 'no weird fetish stuff' (or words to that effect) and I can see how people could categorise this as such. What does everyone else think? Again, it's a very well done picture, possibly not suitable for here though.

- Reply
Tahrey: It's only offensive if you don't like butts. There's no actual sexual content.

- Reply
Grape: @AMKitsune: A lot of what judges if an image is too lewd or not is some of the in-image context. Yeah there's a lot of butt there, but it isn't showing nudity and she's not giving you bed-eyes so the image is CLOSE, but fine.

- Reply
Makkon: I don't know what some viewer's internet diet consists of here, but be real. That is nudity, by definition. Yes, it is sexual in nature. There's no denying that it is objectively a naked cat woman being shown in an intentional angle and pose wanting to get a specific response out of people. Considering all that, I do think this has the right to exist. Even if it's not particularly tasteful, it does have merit. Does it belong here? Eh, probably not, that's ultimately up to the mods.

- Reply
Tahrey: Let's say "it's nothing more than you'd commonly see on a roadside billboard". All the important bits that would exclude it from such a location are obscured.

- Reply
Tahrey: Compare with our old friend here who made a lot of us feel things we couldn't yet properly understand during our 80s/90s childhoods... there's not that much difference.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wA52tVIBEbw

- Reply
Skoon: I don't think this is too lewd for this booru. Have you SEEN some of the other images here?

- Reply
Grape: @Makkon: A few of us mods along with Kazerad have talked about images like this, and the general opinion that it's okay. This image was actually reported and then reinstated, but I agree, the line can be fuzzy at times. <s> Although that still doesn't explain what happened to all the spanking images. </s>

- Reply
POMA: I guess it goes like this: spanking = weird fetish, butts = not-weird fetish.
First | Prev | Random | Next | Last
<< 643 | 644 | 645 | 646 | 647 | 648 | 649 | 650 | 651 | 652 | 653 >>