KuroNeko: I like how the AI also put boobs on the vase in the back.
But yeah, I hope it's going to become a new trend like the no effort "memes" and get flooded by AI art.

VokaalitonTuhka: I feel like I've already seen this.

Kibermozgai: @KuroNeko: Damn, I was sure that vase was wrapped in tapes, but now I just can't unsee this gorgeous chest, lol

KuroNeko: @KuroNeko: shit I just noticed but I obviously meant "I hope it's NOT going to be a new trend"

Zargothrax: Cute Katia.
But, I'm not a big fan of this new outlook on the booru. Still, I think I'd vote for waiting. I just don't think that a preemptive strike against AI art is justified, before even seeing whether it becomes a problem or not. And for those who just really don't want to see AI art here in the mean time, you can use the tag blacklist feature.
But again, as I said I'm not a fan of this direction, so what I just said before feels like playing the devil's advocate against myself.

Zargothrax: @KuroNeko: When you said <i>no effort "memes"</i> I felt personally called out

Zargothrax: And here I join you, Kuro in not being able to edit my comment. (I accidentally used html tags instead of bbcode tags for making the quoted part italic)

GrizzlyBear: I haven’t noticed AI art being a problem here so far, unless this whole time mods have been holding back a flood of AI spam. Regardless I think AI art is bad for the booru and bad for the soul. I will say it makes a damn cute Katia, but it’s disturbing to be able to produce something like this on demand, and post it alongside human creations. It diminishes the accomplishments of the talented artists here as something now redundant and automated, but it’s not art if it’s not human. So I say keep it off the booru
(Credit to ChatGPT for writing this for me)

KuroNeko: @Zargothrax: You shouldn't, your meme redraws are top quality, wouldn't be the same without them

Zargothrax: @Zargothrax: I made a big mistake in stating my stance in that one. I said "I'd vote for waiting" but I meant something like "I think we should wait". Let me clarify what I meant:
I think there is no perfect rational, nor legal reason why AI should be banned from here before it is proven that it is problematic for the booru. That would be a typical case of "guilty before innocent". (Note: I'm talking strictly about AI on the booru, not overarching ethical concerns regarding whether AI art is in general good/bad or if it's theft or not)
HOWEVER,
I'd vote against what I think, because like others, I too don't like where this is going. I have concerns, especially with how it can affect the art community here (they are similar to what others already said).
It's worth noting that the booru is a community for artists and Prequel fans, not machines, or lawyers. As such, we need no flawless rational explanations nor infallible legal reasons to like/dislike something here. This is just the way humans are. In case it turns out that most people here don't like AI art being posted on the booru, that is in my opinion a good enough reason on it's own.

damrok4321: Probably shouldn't tag yourself as an artist if it was generated, but that's all I've got to say.

NewFace: I look forward to calmly hashing out the costs and benefits of machine learning processes in human society, and especially to our inevitable unanimous conclusion which will undoubtedly form a foundation for all future AI legislation around the globe.

Rick2tails: if this is ai art one cant be called the artist.It is really a mash up of art others already drew. having said that.For AI art this isnt bad. no 2 mouths,14 fingers per hand,4 legs or pupils outside of eyes here like so many ai garbage.

vsauce4: @Rick2tails: yeah thats basically AI right now, it collects data from multiple sources and jams it all together. And I highly agree - though I cant find the right words - AI should not be here, or should be very limited. It would be so boring and underwhelming if it wasnt done by an actual person.

vsauce4: @Rick2tails: In other words, there's no emotion... It's all machine lol. I would really hate to see that happen.

ThatGuyWithAKhajiitWaifu: I have toyed with AI generation and got some pretty good Katia stuff on par, but I decided not to keep any of em :p though its interested to experiment with.

Kibermozgai: @Rick2tails: I feel like tagging an artist still be a good thing to do, as long as ai tag still there as well, so nobody gets fooled. Since uploader and the one who actually toyed with gen could be different persons and because even with generated arts you can guess who was creating it by looking on the amount of details, used styles and efforts (or lack of it) putted to fix certain gen's messes. Let's says that author in that case is more like a quality control dude, who still have personal preferences and still could be distinguished from other quality control dudes. Saying that, just like some enjoy works of specific real artists some folks may prefer to see/hide works of a specific qcd standing behind crazy 8-fingers loving robot.

APayne1776_TheThird: Honestly don't mind AI Art. As long as you acknowledge that it is AI Art and you don't claim to have drawn it yourself.

Zargothrax: As far as I know, legislation regarding ownership of AI art goes like this: As an artist, you own the parts of a painting that were actually painted by you. If you use AI to generate a background, and then paint a character in front of it, then, legally, you'd be the owner of the character only. If you only made a single brushstroke on an AI art, then you only own that. And if there were no "manual" steps involved, then you own nothing. In other words, steps performed to alter how the AI generates the art, do not give any ownership to the person, regardless of how much work was involved (and if I'm wrong, I hope I managed to at least invoke Cunningham's law). As such, I'd also not list the "AI operator" under the artist as tag, unless they made significant changes to the art themselves.

We should also distinguish between "AI art" and "AI assisted" art. To me at least, "AI assisted" suggests that a large part of the painting (if not most of it) was made by a human. In other words, the AI only assisted.

Anyway, nice looking Katia. I've noticed it before, that most of the time, AI makes surprisingly pleasant looking lighting.

Snek_Inna_Tenk: Yeah, I’m going to give a hard pass on these machine-generated images on an art booru. Such things don’t belong alongside actual artwork, and any site that allows the two to mix is simply not worth using. I’m here to appreciate the work of actual human beings, not a deluge of mechanical sludge. Especially nowadays, we need places for art that we can actually trust, since it’s gotten harder to tell what’s real and what’s fake at a glance now.

vsauce4: desktop background maybe?

rollanan: ooooo this is a good one, no, a great one, and a great work to you!

Zargothrax: Would like to have the pineapple

rollanan: what Would she do with it?

vsauce4: @rollanan: Unspeakable, talk-of-the-town things.

APayne1776_TheThird: @rollanan: put it on a pizza

rollanan: @APayne1776_TheThird i can approve of that (i love pineapple on pizza, and im pretty sure she does too)

APayne1776_TheThird: @rollanan: honestly it isn't really that bad I just think people hate it because social media says to hate it. I use to be one of those people.

ThatGuyWithAKhajiitWaifu: @APayne1776_TheThird: I also could be that most places just serve bad pineapple on pizza, its a texture thing for me, like they dont use fresh pineapple or something, and its mushy, but i also just love really deep meaty pizzas. Chicago Style is the 'ruler' of pizza.

APayne1776_TheThird: @ThatGuyWithAKhajiitWaifu: Well I never heard of bad pineapple on pizza so IDK.

rollanan: yet another sloppily painted Kat

rollanan: a sloppily painted Kat in a bath

vsauce4: yes, kitty needs a bath! We almost post at the same time too lmao

rollanan: a quick sad cat

ThatGuyWithAKhajiitWaifu: D: give her hugs NOW

rollanan: y-yes sir, omw to hug the cat

rollanan: idk what im doing here

AurraKoKo: i think ur art is amazing <3
i see u around here from time to time. made an account to post this

rollanan: @AurraKoKo i shall give you many thanks then!

Sashimi: Katia, you got your hair back! Wait.....YOU"RE ON FIRE! Cool pic!

DOOMGUY11: I want to touch her hair

Toryu-Mau: ... Woah, now that ya call a warlock! >):^D

Grape: If Sienna Fuegonasus looked half as good as this maybe I'd play her

somebody0214: that reminds me of Rivals Of Aether

CyVoltage: Everything but a beard...she'll never be a wizard

Vidiotdragon: Time to play more Vermintide...

fastolaf: sienna fuegonyasis :3c

LuminosityXVII: Flameo, hotman!

AurraKoKo: wow thats pretty hot.

Cobaliuu: I present to you all: Bushia Bushagan.
The head was an accident, I noticed it looked stupid and just went with the fluff to see where it'd take me and ended up with a straight-up bush.

Zargothrax: I thought this is just regular Katia after falling into a lake and then having her fur dried with a hairdrier

rollanan: Katia Managan, now in extra furry flavour

Almighty_Kat: Katia has acquired a Ghillie suit

NotGodOkay: Morso