Zargothrax: Undoubtedly super cool, regardless of those detail-oversights! I especially like the look of those braids, and the paintbrush-like tail tip.
(Also, I detect some canine feature here)
Zargothrax: You can practically feel the haughtiness in her eyes! Although, I suppose most people who stand in front of her are going to miss that because they'll be looking somewhere else
Nice apparel, btw! Makes her look really majestic.
Also, well done, having the 420th Rajirra post! She should certainly blaze it.
Zargothrax: This looks like as if she was told to take up some Egyptian dress, without ever having heard of this so called "Egypt", then told to sit down for a photo-shooting, without knowing what a photo-shooting is, or what those dwemer contraptions are that they are now aiming at her, making her feel rather anxious. Confused, nervous, misplaced. An innocent kitten, at odds with a convoluted world.
Yeah, I really like this drawing!
Zargothrax: Thank you! I was fascinated by Prequel's witch hunter control panel design when I first found the comic. By now, I feel like I've figured them out.
The cracks were rather easy to make by the way, it's more-or-less just a multiply layer!
Zargothrax: I really like the way you draw QW. Even though her head-fins shouldn't be that large, I'd say they should be, because they suit her so well!
Zargothrax: Just noticed that the linked video is from 2017. I initially thought that was made by you (Nice animation regardless!). Thanks for bringing that up, I've never seen it before!
Zargothrax: This character somehow completely caught me off-guard in the comic. The way she she speaks about her retarded worldview was 10/10 writing imo.
Haven't realized how much the booru needed her, good job on fixing that!
Zargothrax: @Zargothrax: I made a big mistake in stating my stance in that one. I said "I'd vote for waiting" but I meant something like "I think we should wait". Let me clarify what I meant:
I think there is no perfect rational, nor legal reason why AI should be banned from here before it is proven that it is problematic for the booru. That would be a typical case of "guilty before innocent". (Note: I'm talking strictly about AI on the booru, not overarching ethical concerns regarding whether AI art is in general good/bad or if it's theft or not)
HOWEVER,
I'd vote against what I think, because like others, I too don't like where this is going. I have concerns, especially with how it can affect the art community here (they are similar to what others already said).
It's worth noting that the booru is a community for artists and Prequel fans, not machines, or lawyers. As such, we need no flawless rational explanations nor infallible legal reasons to like/dislike something here. This is just the way humans are. In case it turns out that most people here don't like AI art being posted on the booru, that is in my opinion a good enough reason on it's own.
Zargothrax: And here I join you, Kuro in not being able to edit my comment. (I accidentally used html tags instead of bbcode tags for making the quoted part italic)
Zargothrax: Cute Katia.
But, I'm not a big fan of this new outlook on the booru. Still, I think I'd vote for waiting. I just don't think that a preemptive strike against AI art is justified, before even seeing whether it becomes a problem or not. And for those who just really don't want to see AI art here in the mean time, you can use the tag blacklist feature.
But again, as I said I'm not a fan of this direction, so what I just said before feels like playing the devil's advocate against myself.
Zargothrax: As far as I know, legislation regarding ownership of AI art goes like this: As an artist, you own the parts of a painting that were actually painted by you. If you use AI to generate a background, and then paint a character in front of it, then, legally, you'd be the owner of the character only. If you only made a single brushstroke on an AI art, then you only own that. And if there were no "manual" steps involved, then you own nothing. In other words, steps performed to alter how the AI generates the art, do not give any ownership to the person, regardless of how much work was involved (and if I'm wrong, I hope I managed to at least invoke Cunningham's law). As such, I'd also not list the "AI operator" under the artist as tag, unless they made significant changes to the art themselves.
We should also distinguish between "AI art" and "AI assisted" art. To me at least, "AI assisted" suggests that a large part of the painting (if not most of it) was made by a human. In other words, the AI only assisted.
Anyway, nice looking Katia. I've noticed it before, that most of the time, AI makes surprisingly pleasant looking lighting.
Zargothrax: Seeing her right eye when looking at her left is giving some Admiral Ackbar vibes here. In general, her eyes are further back.
Not a bad first try though
Zargothrax: I wanted to say that on the 3rd panel her unusually long snout gives her a canine appearance (Wolfia Managan?), then I checked the link and it all makes more sense now.
Nice
Zargothrax: Aw, she looks adorable!
By the way, make sure to tag yourself as the artist (given the sign on the lower right of the image and your username, I assumed you are the artist)
Dramatic Descriptions
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
(Also, I detect some canine feature here)
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
Nice apparel, btw! Makes her look really majestic.
Also, well done, having the 420th Rajirra post! She should certainly blaze it.
- Reply
Yeah, I really like this drawing!
- Reply
The cracks were rather easy to make by the way, it's more-or-less just a multiply layer!
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
(nice book title)
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
Haven't realized how much the booru needed her, good job on fixing that!
- Reply
- Reply
I think there is no perfect rational, nor legal reason why AI should be banned from here before it is proven that it is problematic for the booru. That would be a typical case of "guilty before innocent". (Note: I'm talking strictly about AI on the booru, not overarching ethical concerns regarding whether AI art is in general good/bad or if it's theft or not)
HOWEVER,
I'd vote against what I think, because like others, I too don't like where this is going. I have concerns, especially with how it can affect the art community here (they are similar to what others already said).
It's worth noting that the booru is a community for artists and Prequel fans, not machines, or lawyers. As such, we need no flawless rational explanations nor infallible legal reasons to like/dislike something here. This is just the way humans are. In case it turns out that most people here don't like AI art being posted on the booru, that is in my opinion a good enough reason on it's own.
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
But, I'm not a big fan of this new outlook on the booru. Still, I think I'd vote for waiting. I just don't think that a preemptive strike against AI art is justified, before even seeing whether it becomes a problem or not. And for those who just really don't want to see AI art here in the mean time, you can use the tag blacklist feature.
But again, as I said I'm not a fan of this direction, so what I just said before feels like playing the devil's advocate against myself.
- Reply
We should also distinguish between "AI art" and "AI assisted" art. To me at least, "AI assisted" suggests that a large part of the painting (if not most of it) was made by a human. In other words, the AI only assisted.
Anyway, nice looking Katia. I've noticed it before, that most of the time, AI makes surprisingly pleasant looking lighting.
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
Not a bad first try though
- Reply
Nice
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
By the way, make sure to tag yourself as the artist (given the sign on the lower right of the image and your username, I assumed you are the artist)
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
Anyway, thanks, guys, it's good to see that after all these years, these drawings still have a target audience.